Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 16:51
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$369
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 63.8
1-Core 159
2-Core 319
94% 181 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 1,178
107% 898 Pts
64-Core 2,675
166% 2,675 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
MSI(1462 3882) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.01
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 123
Parallax 143
119% 138 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 120
Splatting 79
89% 113 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 107%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1607 992 967 900 788 714 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,638
Write 1,987
Mixed 1,610
SusWrite 995
351% 1,557 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 62
213% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 1,273
DQ Write 976
DQ Mixed 1,098
828% 1,116 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 242%
Great: 347%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
224GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 250 161 160 260 351 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 420
Write 155
Mixed 161
SusWrite 264
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 34.6
109% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 209
157% 211 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 195 200 199 199 199 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 175 182 167 166 167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 120
Write 152
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 171
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 22.8
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 18
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 0R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 43% 14 152 10 165 27" 2560 1369 HPN3673 OMEN 27i IPS
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,162
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback