Today's hottest deals

HP 860-019nb

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 860-019nb  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180122
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 08:21
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$165
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 255
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 697
70% 570 Pts
64-Core 684
42% 684 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Device(1B0A 90F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.1% Average
Lighting 55.7
Reflection 65.9
Parallax 59
45% 60.2 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 58.3
Splatting 51.5
47% 58.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000H1 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 271 282 279 280 280 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 455
Write 297
Mixed 242
SusWrite 275
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 29.4
113% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 246
206% 301 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
638GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 171 165 168 151 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 174
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 162
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.2
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 23.7
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 7 60 34.1" 3440 1377 DELA12E DELL U3419W
Typical 860-019nb Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: HP 860-019nb

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback