Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 131%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 08:01
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700K-$380
U3E1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Memory 90
1-Core 229
2-Core 461
134% 260 Pts
4-Core 922
8-Core 1,787
161% 1,355 Pts
64-Core 3,876
240% 3,876 Pts
Poor: 124%
This bench: 131%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S880 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN13683
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,955
Write 4,395
Mixed 3,023
847% 3,791 MB/s
4K Read 82.3
4K Write 312
4K Mixed 128
454% 174 MB/s
DQ Read 2335
DQ Write 1,734
DQ Mixed 1,606
1,317% 1,892 MB/s
Poor: 245% Great: 611%
Hs-ssd-e100n 1024G 1TB
213GB free
Firmware: T0921A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 478
Write 329
Mixed 367
87% 391 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 18.7
108% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 31.8
77% 158 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 99%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
223GB free
Firmware: 608ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 286
Write 264
Mixed 285
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 34
138% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 219
167% 224 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40
424GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 117
Write 117
Mixed 67.8
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX 7200 C34 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
203% Outstanding
MC Read 83.2
MC Write 81.1
MC Mixed 76.2
229% 80.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 54.6
SC Mixed 34.4
106% 37.1 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 138%
This bench: 203%
Great: 253%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 0" 2048 1081
Typical GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 9,308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $1,455
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback