HP ProBook 450 G7 Hp Pro Book 450 G7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP ProBook 450 G7 Hp Pro Book 450 G7  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86A0
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200802
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 29 '21 at 15:16
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 258
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 537
58% 461 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 86A0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
2.96% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 7.4
4% 6.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.96%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100n 1024G 1TB
831GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 160 299 12 122 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 479
Write 401
Mixed 27
SusWrite 103
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 0.9
40% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 0.9
20% 52.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 99%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
874GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 114 115 117 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 130
Write 105
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 115
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.8
266% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.8% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback