Gigabyte GA-H310M H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200707
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 06:25
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 72.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 240
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 675
72% 577 Pts
64-Core 688
43% 688 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.8% Very good
Lighting 98.3
Reflection 109
Parallax 98.5
80% 102 fps
MRender 91.2
Gravity 97.6
Splatting 99.3
79% 96 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vi550 S3 SSD 256GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 330
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 408 353 300 220 199 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 383
Write 283
Mixed 385
SusWrite 322
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 38.1
134% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 220
168% 223 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
RMT3200PCD4-16G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 0P 2R 4G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 31% 45 214 57 240 27" 1280 720 AUS278F VG279QM
Typical GA-H310M H Builds (Compare 1,748 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $201
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback