Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory52.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 03:49
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 69.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 289
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 1,109
99% 837 Pts
64-Core 2,179
135% 2,179 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Gigabyte(1458 3FF3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
138% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 191
Parallax 194
153% 191 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 165
Splatting 140
137% 172 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 138%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
684GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1334 895 895 846 919 919 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 2,032
Write 3,438
Mixed 2,203
SusWrite 968
488% 2,160 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 70.5
229% 83.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,141
DQ Write 786
DQ Mixed 935
706% 954 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 255%
Great: 472%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
930GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 449 448 449 449 451 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 448
Mixed 435
SusWrite 446
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 57.1
186% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
Kingston SNVS2000GB 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: S8442105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1067 1117 1116 1121 1122 1135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,289
Write 1148
Mixed 882
SusWrite 1,113
249% 1,108 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 23.7
156% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 694
DQ Mixed 446
426% 670 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 199%
Great: 242%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
655GB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 69 69 68 69 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
33% Below average
Read 72.5
Write 67.3
Mixed 48
SusWrite 68
86% 64 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
117% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.7% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 27.2
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 27.5
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 46: 0P 5R 7G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 41 214 57 60 42.5" 1280 720 GBT4800 AORUS FO48U
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,065
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback