Asrock X670E Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 237%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 233%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics223% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock X670E Steel Legend  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Steel Legend
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231117
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 03:02
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$196
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 87.8
1-Core 206
2-Core 402
122% 232 Pts
4-Core 693
8-Core 1,221
116% 957 Pts
64-Core 1,450
90% 1,450 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 109%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-GRE
XFX(1EAE 790A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
223% Outstanding
Lighting 303
Reflection 356
Parallax 563
247% 407 fps
MRender 332
Gravity 273
Splatting 360
267% 322 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 223%
Great: 228%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6002T 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10660
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2126 2074 2096 2091 2078 2074 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 749
Write 2,301
Mixed 1,835
SusWrite 2,090
400% 1,744 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 95.4
4K Mixed 57.4
200% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,693
DQ Write 1,047
DQ Mixed 727
715% 1,156 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 280%
Great: 345%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
127GB free
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 144 116 131 135 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 455
Write 382
Mixed 174
SusWrite 153
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 8.8
62% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 83.9
DQ Mixed 36.4
45% 80 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 55%
WDC WD40EZAX-00C8UB0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 204 205 204 205 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 205
Write 161
Mixed 145
SusWrite 204
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 0.9
73% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 5.6
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 3.7
4% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 40%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
167GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 71 69 70 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 81.6
Write 74.5
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 69.8
51% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
720GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 146 152 151 150 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 150
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 147
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6000Z30 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
178% Outstanding
MC Read 60.6
MC Write 67.6
MC Mixed 65.5
184% 64.6 GB/s
SC Read 52.2
SC Write 65.7
SC Mixed 59.7
169% 59.2 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 178%
Great: 218%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0P 1R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 24% 37 207 56 165 23.8" 1280 720 ACR0852 XF243Y P
Typical X670E Steel Legend Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E Steel Legend

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $2,177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback