Asus ROG Strix G712LW_G712LW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ROG Strix G712LW_G712LW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G712LW
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime8.9 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 23:05
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 85.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 243
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 793
76% 628 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 198F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 8.3
5% 7.97 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 11.3
8% 9.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD Blue SN570 2T 2TB
662GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1407 1447 1376 1460 1486 1476 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 1,889
Write 1483
Mixed 1516
SusWrite 1,442
355% 1,582 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 58.6
209% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 989
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 701
508% 675 MB/s
Poor: 146%
This bench: 257%
Great: 439%
Nvme Lexar 1TB SSD
263GB free
Firmware: V1.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1282 1442 1481 1444 1371 378 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,080
Write 1,481
Mixed 1,198
SusWrite 1,233
283% 1,248 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 60.5
206% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 932
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 667
482% 641 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 210%
Great: 362%
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GB
354GB free
Firmware: 21106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 878 435 435 435 436 437 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1522
Write 1,425
Mixed 1,118
SusWrite 509
256% 1,144 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 59.1
198% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 994
DQ Write 378
DQ Mixed 831
576% 734 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 184%
Great: 237%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.7% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 21.8
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 17.3" 1280 720 AUO8E8D
Typical ROG Strix G712LW_G712LW Builds (Compare 720 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer

System: Asus ROG Strix G712LW_G712LW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback