Alienware m18 R1 AMD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware m18 R1 AMD  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0X5R2N
Memory3.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240216
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 22:15
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
FL1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 76.2
1-Core 197
2-Core 362
111% 212 Pts
4-Core 712
8-Core 1,295
120% 1,003 Pts
64-Core 1,659
103% 1,659 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 610M
Dell(1028 0C4A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.4.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.43% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 3.9
2% 3.4 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 6
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 2.43%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PC SN810 NVMe WDC 1024GB
787GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61912524 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,595
Write 3,746
Mixed 2994
769% 3,445 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 66.8
202% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1879
DQ Write 1316
DQ Mixed 1,587
1,188% 1,594 MB/s
Poor: 184% Great: 567%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG66AGBSA092N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
110% Outstanding
MC Read 46.9
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 34.1
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 43.1
SC Write 52
SC Mixed 39.1
128% 44.7 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 110%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 165 18" 1280 720 LGD074A
Typical m18 R1 AMD Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO

System: Alienware m18 R1 AMD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 174% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback