Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 137%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics314% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 19:32
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KF-$505
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 240
2-Core 481
140% 271 Pts
4-Core 961
8-Core 1,903
169% 1,432 Pts
64-Core 4,367
270% 4,367 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 137%
Great: 136%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Asus(1043 88CB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3315 MHz, MLim: 6100 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Lighting 483
Reflection 470
Parallax 550
394% 501 fps
MRender 539
Gravity 403
Splatting 269
315% 404 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 314%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO NH 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM51.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,074
Write 3,945
Mixed 3,520
790% 3,513 MB/s
4K Read 69.7
4K Write 294
4K Mixed 107
398% 157 MB/s
DQ Read 2,338
DQ Write 1,859
DQ Mixed 2,119
1,580% 2,105 MB/s
Poor: 262% Great: 576%
Corsair MP600 PRO LPX 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EIFM51.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2867
Write 3,429
Mixed 3,277
716% 3,191 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 343
4K Mixed 112
417% 172 MB/s
DQ Read 2,640
DQ Write 2,064
DQ Mixed 2,397
1,781% 2,367 MB/s
Poor: 253% Great: 602%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 5600 C36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
204% Outstanding
MC Read 83.2
MC Write 80.9
MC Mixed 76.1
229% 80.1 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 54.6
SC Mixed 36.9
113% 39.5 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 127%
This bench: 204%
Great: 187%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 23 240 27" 1280 720 AUS27EE VG27AQML1A
Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 240%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 303%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $1,080
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback