Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics292% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive548% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '24 at 20:29
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KF-$505
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 80.6
81% 80.6 Pts
Poor: 125% Great: 136%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Asus(1043 88CB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
292% Outstanding
Lighting 444
Reflection 426
Parallax 450
362% 440 fps
MRender 530
Gravity 355
Splatting 256
297% 381 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 292%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO NH 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM51.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4518 4765 4706 4592 3305 1503 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
548% Outstanding
Read 2,134
Write 4,306
Mixed 2,927
SusWrite 3,898
756% 3,316 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 335
4K Mixed 128
435% 175 MB/s
DQ Read 2,301
DQ Write 1729
DQ Mixed 1,808
1,408% 1,946 MB/s
Poor: 262%
This bench: 548%
Great: 576%
Corsair MP600 PRO LPX 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EIFM51.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4119 4365 4048 1002 1238 1185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
480% Outstanding
Read 2,400
Write 3,533
Mixed 3,146
SusWrite 2,659
666% 2,935 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 305
4K Mixed 111
387% 157 MB/s
DQ Read 2,551
DQ Write 2,038
DQ Mixed 2,259
1,700% 2,283 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 480%
Great: 602%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 5600 C36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 65.7
MC Write 62
MC Mixed 59
178% 62.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 53.1
SC Mixed 28.6
97% 33.9 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 127%
This bench: 160%
Great: 187%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 49 240 27" 1280 720 AUS27EE VG27AQML1A
Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 240%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 303%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $1,080
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback