Monster TULPAR T7 V20.5

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	86.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T7 V20.5 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.5
Memory	17.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220824
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	May 06 '24 at 18:26
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-12700H 52,857 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Memory 63.8 1-Core 98.8 2-Core 206 67% 123 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 556 53% 439 Pts	64-Core 884 55% 884 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop) 102,706 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Device(1D05 1174) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	86.1% Excellent	Lighting 116 Reflection 109 Parallax 99.1 94% 108 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 76.7 Splatting 69.4 70% 88.2 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 105%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00B07 512GB 403 User benchmarks, average bench 269% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: HXC7002Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1078 716 747 664 1019 893 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	216% Outstanding	Read 1,684 Write 1,737 Mixed 1,401 SusWrite 853 319% 1,419 MB/s	4K Read 55.8 4K Write 96.5 4K Mixed 62.8 216% 71.7 MB/s	DQ Read 811 DQ Write 520 DQ Mixed 647 487% 659 MB/s
Poor: 144% ↑ This bench: 216% Great: 351%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88 262,559 User benchmarks, average bench 251% 559GB free Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 886 1121 1163 1064 1007 1104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	184% Outstanding	Read 1,189 Write 1,182 Mixed 1,231 SusWrite 1,058 263% 1,165 MB/s	4K Read 43.2 4K Write 75.2 4K Mixed 54.9 176% 57.8 MB/s	DQ Read 548 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 433 308% 402 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 184% Great: 365%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M8FF 2x16GB 1,200 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	74% Very good	MC Read 32.2 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 28.8 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 19.6 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	65	54	240	27"	1280 720	AUS27EA VG27VQM

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.5 Builds (Compare 361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 91%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.5

CPU
Core i7-12700HIntelBench 97%, 52,857 samples	361x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	203x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	131x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 15%, 7,232 samples	27x

SSD
MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TBSamsungBench 205%, 7,795 samples	52x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $99Bench 200%, 52,084 samples	40x
MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBSamsungBench 166%, 12,842 samples	39x

RAM
M471A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 87%, 6,443 samples	38x
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples	33x
CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FF 2x16GBCrucialBench 81%, 1,972 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16