Alienware m17 R2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware m17 R2  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware m17 R2
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231103
Uptime12.8 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 16:17
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 199
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 427
46% 368 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Dell(1028 093C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 104
Parallax 107
83% 104 fps
MRender 148
Gravity 99.7
Splatting 91.9
90% 113 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PC SN730 NVMe WDC 512GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11111012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 841 629 565 553 578 560 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,466
Write 1955
Mixed 1,315
SusWrite 621
302% 1,339 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 54.7
179% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 616
DQ Write 495
DQ Mixed 525
401% 545 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 177%
Great: 285%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
255GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1472 822 826 824 828 833 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,359
Write 1,762
Mixed 1,466
SusWrite 934
312% 1,380 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 56.4
183% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 627
DQ Write 522
DQ Mixed 557
422% 569 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 194%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
79% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 22.8
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 23
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 56: 0P 5R 9G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 34 213 56 240 48.8" 1280 720 SAM7053 LC49G95T
Typical m17 R2 Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware m17 R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback