Asrock H510M-HDV/M.2 SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 185%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 192%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock H510M-HDV/M.2 SE  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock H510M-HDV/M.2 SE
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230505
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 15:48
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700F
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 73.5
1-Core 161
2-Core 317
97% 184 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 1,144
106% 882 Pts
64-Core 1,496
93% 1,496 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$550
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Lighting 286
Reflection 266
Parallax 284
233% 279 fps
MRender 364
Gravity 243
Splatting 190
209% 266 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 200%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 727 1022 1262 1325 1318 1320 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,028
Write 1343
Mixed 1,281
SusWrite 1,162
325% 1,454 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 40.9
187% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 778
DQ Write 892
DQ Mixed 559
497% 743 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 245%
Great: 352%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
187GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 290 82 83 84 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 477
Mixed 438
SusWrite 156
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 47.6
158% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 332
250% 336 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 128%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 169 170 169 169 168 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 102%
Hitachi HDT721016SLA380 160GB-$38
148GB free
Firmware: ST1OA38E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 97 99 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 96.6
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 98.7
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 60%
MB1000EBZQB 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: HPG1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 148 148 147 147 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 143
Write 141
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 146
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM3200HLE-16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 21.9
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2WG3-
Typical H510M-HDV/M.2 SE Builds (Compare 228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asrock H510M-HDV/M.2 SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback