Lenovo 30A6S02B00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 30A6S02B00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 102F
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211030
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 11:36
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 164
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 620
56% 471 Pts
64-Core 1,077
67% 1,077 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(1642 3F86) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.50
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
6.31% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 7.4
6% 8.1 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7
6% 8.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.31%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 286 280 291 279 274 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 420
Mixed 399
SusWrite 296
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 44.9
144% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 352
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 130%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 120 119 117 119 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 112
Write 113
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 117
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 84%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
560GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 68 68 67 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 65.7
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 66.6
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 57%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
301GB free
Firmware: AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 104 104 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 86.2
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 103
70% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 55.5
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 44.5
137% 47.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 19.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 120%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 75 23.8" 1280 720 AUS2426 ASUS VA24EQSB
Typical 30A6S02B00 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 30A6S02B00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback