Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 172%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive372% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240110
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 23:43
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700-$281
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 75.9
1-Core 201
2-Core 374
113% 217 Pts
4-Core 736
8-Core 1,272
122% 1,004 Pts
64-Core 1835
114% 1835 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 107%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Asus(1043 892E) ≥ 4GB; ‎DUAL-RTX4060TI-O16G
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Lighting 212
Reflection 196
Parallax 214
173% 207 fps
MRender 313
Gravity 170
Splatting 126
157% 203 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 154%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM710 1TB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9742
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2896 2838 2878 1333 1137 968 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
372% Outstanding
Read 3,366
Write 3,324
Mixed 2389
SusWrite 2,008
622% 2,772 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 59.7
191% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,682
DQ Write 790
DQ Mixed 1338
966% 1270 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 372%
Great: 518%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown UD5-6000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
135% Outstanding
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 52.7
MC Mixed 48.3
138% 48.2 GB/s
SC Read 41
SC Write 54.9
SC Mixed 46.1
135% 47.3 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 135%
Great: 204%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 0P 2R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 29% 34 95 11 144 34" 3440 1417 GBT3403 G34WQC A
Typical GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback