Asus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive487% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 19:47
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$196
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 83.6
1-Core 204
2-Core 408
120% 232 Pts
4-Core 702
8-Core 1,150
113% 926 Pts
64-Core 1,434
89% 1,434 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 107%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.7% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 66.6
56% 69.4 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 65
54% 66.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 990 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4075 3954 4031 4282 4224 2375 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
487% Outstanding
Read 2,163
Write 4,453
Mixed 3,316
SusWrite 3,823
784% 3,439 MB/s
4K Read 68.4
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 90.6
298% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,829
DQ Write 1,542
DQ Mixed 1,730
1,284% 1,700 MB/s
Poor: 231%
This bench: 487%
Great: 582%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C36-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
176% Outstanding
MC Read 56.9
MC Write 69.6
MC Mixed 64.2
182% 63.6 GB/s
SC Read 54.6
SC Write 64
SC Mixed 59.8
170% 59.5 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 176%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0P 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 7% 28 217 57 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 217%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 220%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $966
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback