Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 185%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 170%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211029
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 17:34
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600KF-$118
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 139
2-Core 272
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 860
85% 697 Pts
64-Core 1,108
69% 1,108 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 282
Reflection 252
Parallax 292
230% 276 fps
MRender 328
Gravity 237
Splatting 172
193% 246 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 194%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 2TB SSD
1TB free
Firmware: CS900600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 244 245 247 246 247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 299
Write 448
Mixed 237
SusWrite 246
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 41
137% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 174
135% 185 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 123%
Samsung MZ7LH1T9HMLT-00003 2TB
997GB free
Firmware: HXT76F3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 459 462 465 464 465 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 474
Mixed 425
SusWrite 462
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 41.2
137% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 356
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 107%
Great: 115%
CT2000P3SSD8 2TB
902GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1893 2091 2072 2032 2102 2102 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 1,841
Write 2,168
Mixed 1,864
SusWrite 2,049
448% 1,980 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 55.2
184% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 961
DQ Write 614
DQ Mixed 800
593% 792 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 291%
Great: 417%
PNY CS900 2TB SSD
1TB free
Firmware: CS900600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 454 456 460 459 459 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 471
Mixed 442
SusWrite 457
102% 450 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 44.7
151% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 285
233% 332 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 123%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 157 156 156 157 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 146
Write 148
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 156
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 129 133 128 132 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 67.6
Write 124
Mixed 68
SusWrite 130
72% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
211% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$68
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 24.3
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 28.3
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 58.6
68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2752 e2752Vq
Typical TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,557 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback