Medion MS-7848

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion MS-7848 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION MS-7848
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140408
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	May 05 '24 at 13:40
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 76.9 1-Core 98.3 2-Core 157 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 494 51% 408 Pts	64-Core 486 30% 486 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.29 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43% Average	Lighting 51.4 Reflection 60.3 Parallax 54 42% 55.2 fps	MRender 62.1 Gravity 56.7 Splatting 49.7 45% 56.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-00000 256GB 603 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 49 42 47 50 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 321 Write 89.1 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 49.1 29% 135 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 31 4K Mixed 14.2 60% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 57.7 DQ Mixed 53.9 74% 143 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 93%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 176GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 80 80 76 78 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 70.4 Write 74.8 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 79.3 86% 64.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 2x8GB 1,721 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	47.8% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 14.5 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 13.8 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 13: 0P 1R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
13%	21%	24	368	98	144	24.5"	1280 720	HPN3426 OMEN by HP 25

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7848 Builds (Compare 690 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Medion MS-7848

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	192x
Core i7-4770Intel $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	177x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	135x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	99x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	48x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	42x

SSD
MX100 256GBCrucial $116Bench 83%, 55,768 samples	50x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	28x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	20x

RAM
M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 55%, 1,721 samples	107x
M2F8G64CB8HC5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 54%, 1,156 samples	53x
M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 2x4GBNanyaBench 53%, 1,438 samples	51x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $251

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16