Asus G20CB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G20CB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G20CB
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime13.6 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 09:54
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 211
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 604
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 607
38% 607 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.3% Very good
Lighting 89.2
Reflection 99.6
Parallax 91.2
73% 93.3 fps
MRender 91
Gravity 91.7
Splatting 89.9
74% 90.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G32MND-2200A 256GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200L00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 167 177 159 158 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 438
Write 217
Mixed 281
SusWrite 172
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 21.1
92% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 213
168% 239 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 85%
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
44GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1423
Write 977
Mixed 916
245% 1,105 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 64.4
211% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 818
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 310
330% 554 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 165 165 163 161 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 144
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 163
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
73.7% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 22.2
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 23.8" 1280 720 ACR0CD8 XF240Y M3
Typical G20CB Builds (Compare 995 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

System: Asus G20CB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback