Lenovo 82VF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82VF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240222
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 09:24
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 37.6
1-Core 105
2-Core 195
58% 112 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 448
50% 392 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RadeonT 610M
Legend(17AA 380E) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
5.64% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 11.3
4% 9.03 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 15.6
8% 9.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.64%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFINW512GZL 512GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C02C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 211 113 82 64 28 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 490
Write 339
Mixed 129
SusWrite 96.4
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 14.9
57% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 97.6
DQ Mixed 118
97% 142 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 262%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
62% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 22.9
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 16
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 211
19% 211 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0P 0R 3G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 7% 43 120 9 60 13.9" 1280 720 LEN9020
Typical 82VF Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82VF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback