Lenovo 82VG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82VG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 11:33
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Gold 7220U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 164
58% 104 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 229
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RadeonT 610M
Legend(17AA 380E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.03% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 11.6
5% 9.9 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 18.9
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.03%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL4256HBJD-00BL2 256GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L1QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 958 943 923 1043 1076 1002 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1025
Write 996
Mixed 905
SusWrite 991
221% 979 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 47.5
152% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 891
DQ Write 551
DQ Mixed 725
539% 722 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 181%
Great: 227%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNBK3MLYR-N6E 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 29.5
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 14.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN9051
Typical 82VG Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82VG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback