MSI B450M PRO-M2 MAX (MS-7B84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B84
MotherboardMSI B450M PRO-M2 MAX (MS-7B84)  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 06:56
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 232
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 576
62% 495 Pts
64-Core 603
37% 603 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
MSI(1462 7B84) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 28.6
17% 21.8 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 26
Splatting 15.1
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2.5 240GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42051100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 128 76 27 57 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 319
Write 349
Mixed 368
SusWrite 114
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 34.2
113% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 84.4
87% 144 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 76%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$62
25GB free
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 147 140 132 124 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 435
Write 247
Mixed 308
SusWrite 168
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 14.7
72% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 32.2
46% 85.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
120GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 103 102 103 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 195
Write 108
Mixed 111
SusWrite 102
96% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 21.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.4
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 60%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical B450M PRO-M2 MAX (MS-7B84) Builds (Compare 3,946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450M PRO-M2 MAX (MS-7B84)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $340
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback