Asus A88X-GAMER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A88X-GAMER  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 00:37
Run Duration1162 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 880K-$105
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 120
50% 83 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 183
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 175
Parallax 162
129% 165 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 135
Splatting 118
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 120%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,170
Write 24.6
Mixed 57.1
156% 751 MB/s
4K Read 228
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3.7
352% 78.1 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
121GB free
Firmware: MS2OA810
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 136 148 139 140 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 172
Write 143
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 139
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2133C10-4GXM F3-2133C10-4GXM F3-2133C10-4GAB F3-2133C10-4GAB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.1% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 9.8
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 12% 8 201 44 60 24.5" 1920 1017 AOC2590 2590G5
Typical A88X-GAMER Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus A88X-GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback