Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-C R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 23:56
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 222
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 639
67% 538 Pts
64-Core 844
52% 844 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500M8120G 120GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 81 58 85 65 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 467
Write 302
Mixed 301
SusWrite 79.8
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 37.4
132% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 102
92% 138 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
60GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 24 25 29 17 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX2666C16/8G 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 30.7
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 26
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 1R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 19% 43 210 57 144 0" 1280 720
Typical PRIME A320M-C R2.0 Builds (Compare 269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $162
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback