Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G 2,804 User benchmarks, average bench 29% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	23% Poor	Memory 41.2 1-Core 21 2-Core 29.7 22% 30.6 Pts	4-Core 30.2 8-Core 30 4% 30.1 Pts	64-Core 30.2 2% 30.2 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics 13,349 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 36EC) 80MB Ram: 80MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	0.84% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.37 fps	MRender 1.4 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.84% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
AT422 256GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN15330 SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 311 277 292 297 293 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 334 Write 338 Mixed 320 SusWrite 287 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 12.3 4K Mixed 13.6 49% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 82.8 DQ Write 33 DQ Mixed 73 50% 62.9 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 1x4GB 4,120 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 254 16% 254 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	21	4	60	0"	1440 900	LEN0017 LEN-AIO-330-E

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 29%, 2,804 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	1x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16