MSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231025
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 21:03
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 67.6
1-Core 155
2-Core 298
91% 173 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 866
87% 705 Pts
64-Core 1,094
68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 200
Reflection 186
Parallax 200
163% 195 fps
MRender 275
Gravity 163
Splatting 122
145% 187 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 146%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NQ100 960GB
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11873
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 383 379 398 391 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 408
Write 404
Mixed 385
SusWrite 335
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 32.9
117% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 277
203% 262 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U360016G18I-SBKD3 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 19.8
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 21.4
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 5,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $417
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback