Mm-vision Computer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMm-vision Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190603
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 19:23
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 143
2-Core 287
95% 174 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1,134
101% 852 Pts
64-Core 1,132
70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Asus(1043 8728) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 156
Parallax 170
127% 160 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 133
Splatting 118
116% 146 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 119%
Great: 123%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 735 616 44 29 21 379 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,528
Write 1,506
Mixed 1071
SusWrite 304
246% 1,102 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 74.5
254% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 897
DQ Mixed 323
410% 730 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 200%
Great: 282%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GC3000C16K4D 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 13 60 23.8" 2048 1089 AOC2413 AG241QG
Typical Computer Builds (Compare 1,685 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

System: Mm-vision Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $428
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback