Micro Mercury series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro Mercury series  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen PHBRC
Memory19.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231103
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 06:57
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 57.9
1-Core 154
2-Core 302
88% 171 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 1,188
106% 899 Pts
64-Core 1,454
90% 1,454 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
AMD(1002 0124) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39% Below average
Lighting 44.8
Reflection 25
Parallax 70.2
36% 46.7 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 55.2
Splatting 72.1
44% 50.5 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0 1TB
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFKBO.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1993 2008 2040 1316 1663 1663 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,404
Write 2,209
Mixed 1,546
SusWrite 1,780
394% 1,735 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 49.4
162% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 744
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 728
484% 589 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 238%
Great: 368%
Asmt 2115 2TB
855GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 67 67 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 89.4
Write 62.8
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 66.8
49% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G66AK6BX070N 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
139% Outstanding
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 62.7
MC Mixed 51.3
150% 52.6 GB/s
SC Read 30.5
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 40.9
107% 37.4 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 93%
This bench: 139%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 0.7" 1280 720 HTC00BD FPD TV
Typical Mercury series Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Micro Mercury series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback