Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory45.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 02:27
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 155
2-Core 312
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 901
95% 760 Pts
64-Core 1,099
68% 1,099 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 750 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
7.07% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 7.7
7% 9.07 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 9.4
Splatting 8.3
8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 7.07%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pc401 NVMe SK hynix 512GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80004E00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 780 601 605 607 608 606 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,523
Write 866
Mixed 1,299
SusWrite 634
241% 1,081 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 57.4
188% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 940
DQ Write 918
DQ Mixed 314
405% 724 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 199%
Great: 215%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
111GB free
Firmware: CXB73D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 324 326 325 325 324 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,993
Write 1011
Mixed 791
SusWrite 352
228% 1,037 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 65.8
218% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,313
DQ Write 1,049
DQ Mixed 986
791% 1,116 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 221%
Great: 243%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CRC Hynix HMA82GU6CJR8N-VK Hynix HMA82GU6CJR8N-VK 48GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.3% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 17
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 18.6
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 18.9" 1280 720 ACI19A9 ASUS VW193T
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback