Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 266%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 308%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics231% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive413% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory18.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240110
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 01:07
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D-$396
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 86.5
1-Core 206
2-Core 392
120% 228 Pts
4-Core 806
8-Core 1,525
139% 1,165 Pts
64-Core 2,725
169% 2,725 Pts
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XT-$900
XFX(1EAE 7905) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 20GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
231% Outstanding
Lighting 295
Reflection 425
Parallax 576
240% 432 fps
MRender 448
Gravity 233
Splatting 429
307% 370 fps
Poor: 158%
This bench: 231%
Great: 249%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S880 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11273
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3556 3621 2817 1085 1029 813 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
413% Outstanding
Read 3920
Write 4,013
Mixed 2,944
SusWrite 2,154
731% 3,258 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 73.5
241% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,376
DQ Write 865
DQ Mixed 1198
872% 1,146 MB/s
Poor: 245%
This bench: 413%
Great: 611%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: VF001C30 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3455 3538 680 174 233 284 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 2,098
Write 3,596
Mixed 1,931
SusWrite 1,394
510% 2,255 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 63.3
209% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,551
DQ Write 1257
DQ Mixed 1,368
1,034% 1,392 MB/s
Poor: 181%
This bench: 296%
Great: 574%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
819GB free
Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1754 1756 1763 1762 1759 1765 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 2,388
Write 1,770
Mixed 214
SusWrite 1,760
341% 1,533 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 67.6
224% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,281
DQ Write 1,192
DQ Mixed 507
581% 993 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 327%
Great: 310%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 169 172 171 175 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 149
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 168
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2D6000C36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
219% Outstanding
MC Read 113
MC Write 61.5
MC Mixed 73.7
237% 82.9 GB/s
SC Read 49.9
SC Write 67.4
SC Mixed 57.1
166% 58.1 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 132%
This bench: 219%
Great: 200%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 120 43" 1280 720 SNYE405 SONY TV *30
Typical GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $2,107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback