HP EliteBook 645 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteBook 645 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89D2
Memory3.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240201
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 18:03
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 53.6
1-Core 151
2-Core 251
80% 152 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 695
75% 597 Pts
64-Core 778
48% 778 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 89D2) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.21018.14002
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 13
Parallax 23.7
14% 17.9 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 19.6
13% 14.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00BH1 256GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 385 430 552 552 555 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 1,184
Write 516
Mixed 651
SusWrite 478
157% 707 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 39
124% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 212
170% 241 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 127%
Great: 200%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 70 73 72 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 106
Write 107
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 71.9
110% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.8
34% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43AB2-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.2% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 12.2
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 13.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 16 60 23.8" 1280 720 LEN61A6 T24i-10
Typical EliteBook 645 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 645 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback