MSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7786
MotherboardMSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786)  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120831
Uptime22.5 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 21:04
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3670 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 41
2-Core 84.2
43% 65.9 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 161
22% 161 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D
MSI(1462 7786) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
2.64% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 2.9
2% 3.5 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.64%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 149 16 60 14 76 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.1% Poor
Read 218
Write 195
Mixed 11
SusWrite 75.2
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.3
26% 6.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 92%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 124 119 120 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
69% Good
Read 120
Write 121
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 121
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ST51264BA1339.16FM 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.4% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.6
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.3
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 48 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM56F9 W2361
Typical A55M-P33 (MS-7786) Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786) - $65

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $169
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback