Lenovo 83A2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 83A2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230904
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 20:39
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Processor U300
U3E1, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 65.7
1-Core 155
2-Core 240
84% 154 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 518
59% 459 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3809) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
9.26% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 11.2
8% 12.4 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 12.4
11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.26%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ512MKP1QDY 512GB
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2L06A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1829 2177 1939 2201 2370 1040 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,107
Write 2,165
Mixed 1,362
SusWrite 1926
374% 1,640 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 236
4K Mixed 19.9
205% 97.2 MB/s
DQ Read 456
DQ Write 859
DQ Mixed 461
406% 592 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 249%
Great: 328%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN Samsung M471A1G44CB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 28.9
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 23.4
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 28 60 17.3" 1280 720 BOE09C1
Typical 83A2 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 83A2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback