HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 Laptop 16-f2xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemHP Spectre x360 2-in-1 Laptop 16-f2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 891E
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3072 x 1920 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240328
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 19:00
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Memory 45.1
1-Core 53.2
2-Core 95.6
38% 64.6 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 323
30% 247 Pts
64-Core 793
49% 793 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 891E) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4034
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 20.1
Parallax 31.8
14% 23.2 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 35.9
Splatting 22.8
23% 28.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN810 SDCPNRY-1T00-1006 1TB
781GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 650
Write 499
Mixed 563
127% 570 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 8.8
29% 8.9 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 77.4
DQ Mixed 234
155% 189 MB/s
Poor: 184% Great: 533%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4AAG165WB-BCWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
71.1% Very good
MC Read 33
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 27.4
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 50 60 16" 1280 720 AUO60A3
Typical Spectre x360 2-in-1 Laptop 16-f2xxx Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 Laptop 16-f2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback