HP OMEN by HP Transcend Gaming Laptop 16-u0xxx

Performance Results

Gaming 15%
Desktop 60%
Workstation 16%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Transcend Gaming Laptop 16-u0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8BB3
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 15:41
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 153
54% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 530
48% 403 Pts
64-Core 1,145
71% 1,145 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 55%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8BB3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver.
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.51% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 10.4
8% 11.6 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 10.6
10% 12 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.51%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN810 SDCPNRY-1T00-1006 1TB
903GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1027 1002 1001 1015 1027 1011 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,818
Write 1,011
Mixed 973
SusWrite 1,014
268% 1,204 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 30.5
118% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 445
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 356
249% 320 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 184%
Great: 533%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
96.8% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 40.7
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 17.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 16" 1280 720 AUO58A5
Typical OMEN by HP Transcend Gaming Laptop 16-u0xxx Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 144%
Desktop 111%
Workstation 162%

System: HP OMEN by HP Transcend Gaming Laptop 16-u0xxx

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback