Asrock B560M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B560M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 23:12
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900-$281
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 151
2-Core 298
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 1,009
96% 797 Pts
64-Core 1,664
103% 1,664 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 130
Parallax 128
117% 134 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 104
Splatting 98.8
92% 115 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T2531TB 1TB
864GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0714A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 434 433 434 433 434 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 434
Mixed 413
SusWrite 434
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 28.7
126% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 49.6
92% 177 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3000C15-8GTZR Skill Intl F4-3000C16-8GTZR 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 19.4
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 21.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 57 60 27" 1280 720 VSC3C3A XG270Q
Typical B560M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B560M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback