Mm-vision Computer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMm-vision Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191126
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 21:00
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$429
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 282
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 1,011
95% 788 Pts
64-Core 1,539
95% 1,539 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 164
Parallax 157
131% 161 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 143
Splatting 124
121% 152 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 122%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$148
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 985 1111 1095 1068 1070 1018 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 2,460
Write 2,280
Mixed 1,647
SusWrite 1,058
416% 1,861 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 76.6
255% 88.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,201
DQ Write 894
DQ Mixed 1,034
776% 1,043 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 289%
Great: 372%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
51GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,455
Write 1,509
Mixed 1,068
300% 1,344 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 72.5
247% 88.3 MB/s
DQ Read 631
DQ Write 910
DQ Mixed 270
344% 604 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GC3000C16K4D 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 27.1
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 40.2
SC Mixed 27.4
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 31.5" 1280 720 MSI1462 Optix AG32CQ
Typical Computer Builds (Compare 1,683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

System: Mm-vision Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $428
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback