Asus TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 160%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 176%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 122%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 17:05
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600KF-$235
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 212
2-Core 419
124% 239 Pts
4-Core 852
8-Core 1,490
141% 1,171 Pts
64-Core 2,489
154% 2,489 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 122%
Great: 127%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 246
Parallax 171
131% 192 fps
MRender 297
Gravity 170
Splatting 128
154% 198 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 131%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM620 1TB
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12544
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1780 1870 1962 1969 1158 1136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 1,526
Write 2,373
Mixed 1645
SusWrite 1,646
408% 1,798 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 56.4
232% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,719
DQ Write 824
DQ Mixed 590
619% 1,044 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 288%
Great: 348%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4BU016G-3200XG 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 37.8
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 31.2
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2703 ASUS VG279Q1A
Typical TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 1,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 224%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 243%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $848
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback