Samsung 960QGK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive487% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemSamsung 960QGK  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP960QGK-KG1FR
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240323
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 13:35
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 6.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 55.1
1-Core 178
2-Core 336
97% 189 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 601
62% 498 Pts
64-Core 1,133
70% 1,133 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics
Sanyo(144D C892) 128MB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 52.6
14% 30.8 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 47.6
31% 36.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDSN740-SDDPNQD-1T00-1004 1TB
828GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73100004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3325 2472 2590 3243 3156 2932 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
487% Outstanding
Read 3,904
Write 3,858
Mixed 2,914
SusWrite 2,953
766% 3,407 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 87
308% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,376
DQ Write 1,111
DQ Mixed 1,268
942% 1,252 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 487%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 63.8
MC Write 55.2
MC Mixed 60.4
171% 59.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 26.3
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 150%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0P 1R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 25% 12 117 57 60 16" 1440 829 SDC4187
Typical 960QGK Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: Samsung 960QGK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback