Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 3.97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	9.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS Graphics 2,625 User benchmarks, average bench 82% FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	3.97% Terrible	Memory 4.64 1-Core 7.7 2-Core 9.8 4% 7.38 Pts	4-Core 19.1 8-Core 19.4 3% 19.2 Pts	64-Core 31.7 2% 31.7 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 3.97% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon 660M 43 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 13DF) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.14 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	9.02% Terrible	Lighting 7.9 Reflection 7.2 Parallax 31 6% 15.4 fps	MRender 8.9 Gravity 19.8 Splatting 20.7 14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 9.02% Great: 16%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GB 2,451 User benchmarks, average bench 248% 337GB free (System drive) Firmware: HXC70W1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 549 Write 482 Mixed 598 121% 543 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 6.9 4K Mixed 7.1 25% 7.37 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 332%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA092N JM4800ASG-8G 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 5600, 4800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.1% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 11.8 28% 9.63 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3 9% 3.2 GB/s	Latency 329 12% 329 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 116%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	24	9	144	15.5"	1280 720	CMN1521

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

CPU
Ryzen 5 7535HS GraphicsAMDBench 82%, 2,625 samples	7x
Ryzen 7 7735HSAMDBench 79%, 3,338 samples	2x

SSD
OM8PGP4512Q-AI 512GBKingstonBench 252%, 100 samples	3x
MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 2,451 samples	3x
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GBBench 192%, 5,198 samples	2x

RAM
M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOD 1x8GBSamsungBench 67%, 559 samples	2x
HMCG66AGBSA092N 1x8GBHynixBench 68%, 234 samples	2x
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GBSamsungBench 120%, 26,893 samples	1x