Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 467%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 626%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 128%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics384% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive673% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 10:39
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$461
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 232
2-Core 464
132% 259 Pts
4-Core 927
8-Core 1,809
162% 1,368 Pts
64-Core 4,240
262% 4,240 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 128%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,750
Asus(1043 889C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
384% Outstanding
Lighting 609
Reflection 587
Parallax 728
496% 641 fps
MRender 539
Gravity 577
Splatting 311
373% 476 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 384%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$293
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 624311WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4680 4714 4714 4765 4763 4047 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
673% Outstanding
Read 4,689
Write 4,436
Mixed 3,548
SusWrite 4,614
973% 4,322 MB/s
4K Read 84.2
4K Write 258
4K Mixed 109
404% 150 MB/s
DQ Read 2,001
DQ Write 1,587
DQ Mixed 1,782
1,337% 1,790 MB/s
Poor: 292%
This bench: 673%
Great: 682%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX5M2B5600C36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
179% Outstanding
MC Read 74.7
MC Write 69.3
MC Mixed 67.6
202% 70.5 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 51.6
SC Mixed 32.1
101% 35.2 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 133%
This bench: 179%
Great: 190%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 28.6" 1280 720 SAM7177 LS28AG700N
Typical GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 3,196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 251%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback