Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 459%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 617%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics383% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive641% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 09:19
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$461
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 226
2-Core 459
130% 255 Pts
4-Core 911
8-Core 1,753
158% 1,332 Pts
64-Core 4245
263% 4245 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 126%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,750
Asus(1043 889C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
383% Outstanding
Lighting 609
Reflection 589
Parallax 726
496% 641 fps
MRender 538
Gravity 576
Splatting 297
367% 470 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 383%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$293
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 624311WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4736 4794 4772 4800 3748 1784 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
641% Outstanding
Read 4,610
Write 4,734
Mixed 3,596
SusWrite 4,106
960% 4,261 MB/s
4K Read 84.5
4K Write 258
4K Mixed 110
406% 151 MB/s
DQ Read 2,065
DQ Write 1616
DQ Mixed 1,799
1,357% 1,827 MB/s
Poor: 292%
This bench: 641%
Great: 682%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX5M2B5600C36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
178% Outstanding
MC Read 73.8
MC Write 68.7
MC Mixed 67.4
200% 70 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 50.5
SC Mixed 31.7
100% 35 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 133%
This bench: 178%
Great: 190%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 144 28.6" 1280 720 SAM7177 LS28AG700N
Typical GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 3,196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 251%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback