Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI B360M Xtreme
Memory19.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 04:56
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 663
72% 570 Pts
64-Core 689
43% 689 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70% Very good
Lighting 93
Reflection 85.5
Parallax 76.5
76% 85 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 80
Splatting 72.2
59% 71.6 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 35 75 34 61 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 415
Write 340
Mixed 295
SusWrite 72.2
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 11.7
49% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 88.4
DQ Mixed 35.1
44% 79.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
873GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 168 167 159 164 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 169
Mixed 115
SusWrite 165
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 100%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 24.9
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 25.9
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 0P 4R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 9% 55 214 57 200 29.5" 2560 1017 SPT0BCC Sceptre P30
Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,599 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $344
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback