HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 Mobile Workstation PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ZBook Fury 16 G10 Mobile Workstation PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B92
Memory116.8 GB free of 128 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240123
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 22:27
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13950HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 73.8
1-Core 215
2-Core 416
120% 235 Pts
4-Core 740
8-Core 1,338
125% 1,039 Pts
64-Core 2,852
176% 2,852 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 106%
Great: 121%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8B92) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4887
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
9.55% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 11.8
9% 13 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 11.8
11% 13.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.55%
Great: 10%
Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
HP(103C 8B92) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 260
Parallax 227
172% 233 fps
MRender 338
Gravity 190
Splatting 189
189% 239 fps
Poor: 133%
This bench: 163%
Great: 184%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN810 SDCPNRY-1T00-1006 1TB
540GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,342
Write 2,536
Mixed 2,226
599% 2,702 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 78.2
270% 94.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,073
DQ Write 453
DQ Mixed 930
645% 819 MB/s
Poor: 184% Great: 533%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905789-057.A00G 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
123% Outstanding
MC Read 47.6
MC Write 47.6
MC Mixed 45.2
134% 46.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 28.6
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 16" 1280 720 AUOAB9B
Typical ZBook Fury 16 G10 Mobile Workstation PC Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 Mobile Workstation PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback