Wortmann_ag FR1009586;2120084

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemWortmann_ag FR1009586;2120084  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H110M-D2P-WG-CF
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 21:15
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ALB-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 206
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 400
54% 400 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.2% Above average
Lighting 71.2
Reflection 74.8
Parallax 67.5
58% 71.2 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 71.8
Splatting 66.6
56% 68 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dahua C800 2.5 inch SATA 120GB SSD
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 370 381 389 387 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 477
Write 391
Mixed 366
SusWrite 300
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 11.7
114% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 15.9
62% 132 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB M378A1G43EB1-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 21.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 20.7
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 19 60 23.8" 1280 720 PHLC263 PHL24M1N3200Z
Typical FR1009586;2120084 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Wortmann_ag FR1009586;2120084

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback