Lenovo 10FLS14500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10FLS14500  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30D0
Memory5.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160923
Uptime19.8 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 18:54
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 64.3
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 181
63% 113 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 515
53% 428 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 30D0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
3.71% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 4
4% 4.4 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.71%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-000L7 256GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT03L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 68 68 71 67 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 410
Write 374
Mixed 274
SusWrite 89.6
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 30.9
99% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 299
234% 324 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2666C18-16GRS Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
32.7% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 8.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 11.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 15 60 23" 1920 996 HSD5173 HT231
Typical 10FLS14500 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10FLS14500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback