Lenovo 42844LG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 42844LG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 42844LG
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130726
Uptime20 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 16:14
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Memory 43.9
1-Core 19
2-Core 37.1
23% 33.3 Pts
4-Core 59
8-Core 84.2
9% 71.6 Pts
64-Core 89
6% 89 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M
Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.55
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 1.2
1% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 1.8
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 348 348 332 350 354 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 221
Write 252
Mixed 224
SusWrite 337
59% 258 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 9.2
31% 9.37 MB/s
DQ Read 63.3
DQ Write 51.4
DQ Mixed 56.3
42% 57 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.95% Terrible
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.73 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 2
5% 1.73 GB/s
Latency 309
13% 309 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.95%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 36: 0P 3R 5G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
36% 15% 92 44 22 60 23.8" 1280 720 LEN63A5 T24m-29
Typical 42844LG Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 42844LG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback