HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 171%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8876
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231016
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 05:48
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 88
1-Core 163
2-Core 324
103% 192 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 1,292
114% 969 Pts
64-Core 2,297
142% 2,297 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
EVGA(3842 3755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
144% Outstanding
Lighting 208
Reflection 253
Parallax 169
169% 210 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 146
Splatting 130
126% 158 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 144%
Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW010T9 1TB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 619 41 266 38 89 231 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,429
Write 1,359
Mixed 1,087
SusWrite 214
228% 1,022 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 58
191% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 871
DQ Write 402
DQ Mixed 609
459% 627 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 158%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP37D4U1S8ME-8XR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 3467 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 51.1
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 34.9
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 35.8
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 114%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 27" 1280 720 SAM71E1 LS27AG55x
Typical OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-1xxx Builds (Compare 4,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 180%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO

System: HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,059
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback