Asus G750JW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemAsus G750JW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JW
Memory10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 02:51
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 179
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 467
51% 403 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 765M
Asus(1043 119D) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 19.7
12% 16.4 fps
MRender 16.5
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 14.9
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NQ100 480GB
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11873
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 442
Write 451
Mixed 410
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 32.6
115% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 251
185% 240 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 106%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60
699GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 128
Write 117
Mixed 84.7
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 71%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
52GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 276
Write 23.4
Mixed 59.4
105% 120 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 4.8
806% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 16.6
DQ Write 19.4
DQ Mixed 5.6
912% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.7% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 17.2" 1280 720 AUO219D
Typical G750JW Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $408
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback